0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼DZâ¹Ý ½Ç½À ½Ã °£È£ÇлýÀÇ °£È£»çÁ¤ ¹× ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë ±â¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ç¥ÁØÈ­ ȯÀÚ¿Í ±³¼öÀÚ °£ÀÇ Æò°¡ ÀÏÄ¡µµ

Comparison of Standardized Patient and Faculty Agreement in Evaluating Nursing Students¡¯ Assessment and Communication Skills

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 24±Ç 3È£ p.189 ~ 199
KMID : 0388320170240030189
±è¿µÁÖ ( Kim Young-Ju ) - ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the level of agreement between a standardized patient (SP) and a faculty member in the evaluation of nursing students¡¯assessment and communication skills.

Methods: Participants were 51 third year nursing students in a simulation practice of ¡®nursing care for a patient admitted with chest pain¡¯. Using a 30-item checklist and a 16-item communication tool, a SP and faculty member evaluated the students¡¯ assessment and communication skills during the simulation.

Results: The average values for percent agreement and kappa statistic for nursing assessment between the two evaluators were 85.3% and .48 respectively. Twenty of thirty items evaluating assessment skill had above moderate agreement (¡Ã.41) by kappa between the evaluators. Seven of sixteen items evaluating communication and interpersonal skills showed above fair agreement (¡Ã.40) between the two evaluators, which was measured by intraclass correlation coefficient.

Conclusion: The findings show that the evaluation of the SP was consistent with those of the faculty member to a moderate degree. Clear guidelines for evaluating criteria and optimal time and effort for SP training are necessary to increase the reliability of standardized patients as evaluators in simulation-based nursing education.
KeyWords
ȯÀڽùķ¹À̼Ç, ÀÇ»ç¼ÒÅë, °£È£±³À°, °üÂûÀÚ°£ º¯ÀÌ
Patient simulation, Communication, Nursing education, Inter-observer variation
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed